Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this competitive and innovative world, personal as well as professional development are very important for career growth. Personality development, communication skill, grooming etc. come under personal development whereas professional growth is one in which person can grow professionally by sharpen their skill or by adding new skill which helps in growing further in organization ladder. Many argues that personal development is more important than the professional development and other argues that for professional development and advancement in career both the development play significant role. I will give my opinion on personal and professional development in upcoming paragraph with examples.
To begin with, personal development, it is very essential and important at every stage in life and there are enormous benefits of personal development. It is a base for professional development. For personal development first of all one need to find their weakness and work on that. For example, Some people have language barrier then they need to work on that and need to get rid of that barrier. This will help them in professional growth.
On the contrary part, for professional growth personal development are very important. For example, if someone is very good at given task but if he will not be able to communicate the same than he will not grow professionally. Nowadays many multinational conduct inhouse training for their employees who are good at their work but they are not able to communication due to some reason. They first take test and based on result they fine missing link and they train their employee according which will help them in advancement of their career.
In conclusion, Personal and professional both developments are very important for success in career growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-17 | Ekta shah | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Nainajovitta | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Nainajovitta | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | sajid.uett | 77 | view |
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give 70
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 72
- Whether formal writing examination is a good way to assess students learning? 77
- Nowadays people spending too much time at work to an extent that they hardly have any time for their personal life. Discuss. 55
- Medical technology is responsible for human s life expectancy Is it a curse or a blessing to the society as a whole 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... very important. For example, if someone is very good at given task but if he wil...
^^
Line 13, column 238, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun conduct seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much multinational conduct', 'a good deal of multinational conduct'.
Suggestion: much multinational conduct; a good deal of multinational conduct
... will not grow professionally. Nowadays many multinational conduct inhouse training for their employees wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43816254417 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15929517062 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505300353357 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.565425166 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352523666642 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150445847513 0.0925447433944 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110269003257 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248544790279 0.151781067708 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958857243493 0.0609392437508 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.