Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Extinction is seen as a natural process in the history but it does not mean that each species' faith is to be vanished. Humans' activities can cause the speed up the natural extinction process but humans also have the ability to save species. Some disagree with this idea and thinks that natural process must not be perturbated unless it is caused by people. Still, not helping those animals could cause imbalances in ecosystem and humans' lives.
To begin with, each animal or plant has a significant role in the ecosystem. When one of them is extinct, this could endanger serious problems for humans. For example, flies are disturbing insects and thought to be useless. Actually, while they feed on the dead animals and garbages, they decompose the material for earth to use again. Moreover, many plants, spiders and bigger inspects feed on flies for its protein. Therefore, losing flies can cause severe disturbances on the food chain and ecosystem recycling. If there is a slight possibility that ecosystem is off balance due to an extinction, people must find a way to help the organism. Otherwise, our daily lives would be interrupted severily.
Secondly, humans heavily rely on certain animals both for companionship and meat production. While dogs are the loyal friends of people, chickens and cows are used to keep many people from starving. Let's think about a natural outbreak occuring among chickens. Since their numbers are decreasing substantially, butchers and markets cannot supply enough to feed humans. In the process, the price of other meats increases and more people are under risk of dying. If the policy was implemented, penury would result in many people to starve or get sick. Even in the annihilation due to natural causes, having responsibilities to help chickens could help us to save many lives around the world.
On the opposite side, some may discuss the laissez-faire intuition for the nature, which tells that human cannot be involved in a natural process unless they are the cause. If the nature does not prefer to host a species, it has a right to remove it from earth surface. For instance, mentioned rule suggests that we should not help a dog fallen inside of a frozen lake. What about a child starving due to natural causes? After taking a picture of a starving boy in Africa, the famous cameraman did not help the kid, which completely complies with laissez-faire. The incident is not moral even though the rule suggests it. Furthermore, considering laisses-faire for only animals is speciesism, which also is not moral because all living creatures are the part of this nature.
In conclusion, consequences of the policy are pernicious imbalances in human life and ecosystem. Disappearences of species, which each has a purpose in nature including humans, endanger the functioning of nature. Also, it leads to horrible results for human beings. Hence, society must save endangered species although some people think that as an intervene to nature's businesses because the consequences of not helping are worst than intervening.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 58
- "To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space i 69
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 200, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...used to keep many people from starving. Lets think about a natural outbreak occuring...
^^^^
Line 17, column 346, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...cies although some people think that as an intervene to natures businesses because the conse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 425, Rule ID: WORST_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse'?
Suggestion: worse
...use the consequences of not helping are worst than intervening.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2579.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11706349206 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7712273957 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 804.6 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0408669512 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.9666666667 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136129076122 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322999435772 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456638122041 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862353074428 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675061614017 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.