There have appeared endless discussions over teacher appreciation. Sociologists argue that society appreciated and valued teacher more in the past. Personally, I strongly disapprove of this statement.
On one hand, what takes my priority is teachers' value. It is well noted that education plays a more crucial role nowadays than in the past. For instance, it is important for people to have specialized knowledge for their specialized jobs, or a wide variety knowledge to understand events happening around them. For that reason, society put more emphasis on education, and so teachers, with a more crucial role, are highly likely to be valued and respected by society. More importantly, the fact is that anyone who is teacher certainly are much more knowledgeable now comparing to teachers in the past. Teachers nowadays are especially skilled at one subject, or thoroughly understand different aspects of their teachings. For example, a professor at a university is sure to be a specialist in their fields, or even a preschool teacher must have had plentiful training and experience with children. Therefore, society have a tendency to greatly appreciate and value teachers. Indeed, teachers nowadays are more appreciated than in the past.
On the other hand, some people might say that since technology has enable many, efficient resources and methods for self-learning, people are no longer dependent on teachers. As a consequence, society cease to appreciate and value teachers as much as it did before. However, that is not necessarily the case. In fact, only by being taught by a human being can people completely grasp and understand the material. Thus, teachers are still needed by society. Moreover, it is common knowledge that in the modern world, everyone goes to school from a very young age. They study under their teacher, and be not only taught facts or concepts, but also taught how to be a well-rounded human being. In other words, teachers are like a third parent to the children. Subsequently, people have a special bond with their teachers. Accordingly, society is bound to have great appreciation for their teachers. By and large, the claim that society has ceased to respect and value teachers is intrinsically false.
In summary, the higher importance of education, teachers being more knowledgeable and a third parent are convincing reasons for my disapproval. It is highly recommended that sociologists should take my writing into detailed consideration to make an appropriate decision on teachers' appreciation.
- TPO 27 integrated writing Little ice age 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 41 - integrated writing 88
- TPO 50 Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
...ple might say that since technology has enable many, efficient resources and methods f...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...tion to make an appropriate decision on teachers appreciation.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, for instance, in fact, in summary, by and large, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32506203474 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0304624851 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518610421836 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.921832021 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.84 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.12 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.32 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22433626865 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774635612824 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766422650962 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153830509965 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599393326413 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.