There have appeared endless discussions over news intake. Sociologists argue that knowledge about events happening around the world is important despite the unlikelihood of them affecting daily life. Personally, I approve of this argument.
On one hand, what takes my priority is personal enjoyment. It is well noted that everyone follows the news, meaning that everyone is very aware of global events. Therefore, following events around the world creates a common subject between people. For that reason, it is much easier for people to find a common ground to communicate, increasing the amount of time talking together. It follows that this allows people to have more communication, and that they can chat more with others. People are bound to enjoy chatting, thus be filled with joy and happiness. More interestingly, the fact is that there is likelihood that learning about global events can be very valuable. Similar to learning history, which certainly teaches people many lessons, global news are also educational. An insightful person is surely able to draw important lessons from following global events. Subsequently, people enhance their knowledge, and this has a tendency to bring a sense of pride to people. On that ground, following worldwide events brings joy to people. Indeed, knowing events happening around the world ameliorates people’s happiness.
On the other hand, some people might say that knowing about world events is a complete waste of time and energy, since this sort of knowledge is beneficial only to important global-scale decision. As a consequence, learning worldwide events prevents people from personal enjoyment. However, this is not necessarily the case. In fact, there are many scenarios where knowledge of events around the world can help ordinary people. For instance, it may affect people’s decision to travel to another country for vacation or studies. Furthermore, it is common knowledge that global events have a high probability to seem interesting to normal human beings. Political stories around the world are an example, as they are very entertaining. New policies in another country are likely to incite curiosity and speculation from news followers. Hence, knowing about events happening around the world has a high possibility of being enjoyable. Accordingly, people stand a golden chance of enjoy themselves when learning about worldwide events. By and large, the claim that people are no longer happy when learning global events is intrinsically false.
In summary, topics for communication, drawn lessons and interests with global events are convincing reasons for my approval. It is highly recommended that sociologists should take my writing into detailed consideration to make an appropriate decision on news intake.
- TPO 28 - Integrated Writing Task 88
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task 71
- TPO 30 Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO 27 integrated writing Little ice age 75
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in fact, in summary, sort of, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50697674419 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89475010154 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0540041754 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5714285714 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3571428571 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.67857142857 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235296184809 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676766093162 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823327945697 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155654688799 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726292547816 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.