TPO14
The lecture and the article are both about the effect of salvage logging on the forest and economy. The article feels that salvage logging is very beneficial for the natural jungles and for economy and provides three reasons of suport. The lecturer chellenges the claims made by the article. He is of the opinion that these explanations are faulty.
To begine with, the writer states that if dead trees are removed, the space will provide for fresh growth. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that log decomposing is very useful for the soil and make the soil enrich. Without decomposing the forests soil is very weak and free of nutrients so the new plans don't have enrich soil to grow.
Secondly, the author mentions that decaying wood would be a sutable habitat for harmful insects like bark beetles which are important danger for the trees. The lecturer, however rebuts this by mentioning that bark beetles have lived in forests for a long time and they are not a serious threat for the trees. Moreover, the harmful effects of salvage logging is more important than this kind of insects.
Last but not least, The author posits that logging industriesnot only have an important affect on the economy but also provide a lot of jobs for human.In contrast, the lecturer position is that savage logging is an expensive industy and need some xpensive devices like helicopter to relocate loges and also these kind of job is temporary. In addition, No one can rely on temporery jobs.
- TPO 25 71
- Do you agreeor disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements makes products seem much better that they really are 80
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO29 80
- TPO10 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y and provides three reasons of suport. The lecturer chellenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... and free of nutrients so the new plans dont have enrich soil to grow. Secondly...
^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'enriched'.
Suggestion: enriched
...of nutrients so the new plans dont have enrich soil to grow. Secondly, the author...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 89, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ng industriesnot only have an important affect on the economy but also provide a lot of j...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ut also provide a lot of jobs for human.In contrast, the lecturer position is that...
^^
Line 13, column 308, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...e helicopter to relocate loges and also these kind of job is temporary. In addition, No on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8992248062 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41000508542 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562015503876 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6774515297 49.2860985944 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2307692308 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36240776863 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114594687994 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775705074817 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19829638093 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576163838201 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.