The bar graph shows about commuters used modes of transport in European country in three years.
The information about how much proportion of commuters used distinct modes of transportation in European Country in particular years from 1960 to 2000 is elucidated in the bar graph.
Meticulously observing the graph, it can be seen that initiating at around 17%in 1960, increased to 27%in 1980, proportion of commuters who used train for travelling again dipped at 22%in 2000.By contrast, approximately 7%commuters travelled by car in 1960, simultaneously equivalent figure showed rose of 15%in subsequent years and figure sky rocketed at around 37%in following year.
Moving towards the rest of illustration, voyagers who utilised tube their proportion had been accounted 27%in initial year, statistics followed by next two years with 23%in 1980 and 25% in 2000.Contrarily,figure exhibited discrepancy of almost 10% in the travellers who did travel by bus that was 37% in 1960 and 27% in 1980 correspondingly. Moreover, in later years, figure for bus commuters remained univariable at 15%.
Overall, it is vivid from an overall analysis , majority of commuters used car in last year while being least bus.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-25 | Raman Maan | 78 | view |
- The chart shows information about both sexes whorls are uneducated in different areas of word in 2000. 78
- Many people think that we have to focus on extinction of certain animal species while others think we should pay attention on problems of human .Discuss both view 89
- The bar graph shows about commuters used modes of transport in European country in three years. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...r travelling again dipped at 22%in 2000.By contrast, approximately 7%commuters tra...
^^
Line 9, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Contrarily
...o years with 23%in 1980 and 25% in 2000.Contrarily,figure exhibited discrepancy of almost ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , figure
...th 23%in 1980 and 25% in 2000.Contrarily,figure exhibited discrepancy of almost 10% in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 46, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ll, it is vivid from an overall analysis , majority of commuters used car in last ...
^^
Line 13, column 99, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'being the least'.
Suggestion: being the least
...f commuters used car in last year while being least bus.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52325581395 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31492684958 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.703488372093 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.735779457 43.030603864 283% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 190.0 112.824112599 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213900989737 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139139383247 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145161925591 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159136440995 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152441012951 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.2329268293 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 61.2550243902 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.