Undoubtedly, teachers hold the most important role while children's opinions are shaping to stand on their own ideas. Because of this critical role of teachers, a controversial question comes to our minds whether teachers should make their political and social views known to students in the classroom or not. From my humble perspective, except for a few disadvantages, I believe in the long term that students will acquire valuable and numerous skills if the teachers make their points of view, in such topics, known in the classroom.
The first and most important advantage is that students can develop critical thinking ability at a younger age. Skillful teachers can transfer their opinion objectively in the classroom, whereas, they must give an extreme effort to mention every detail in the topic for students to understand them properly. Moreover, discussion and debate hours among students, which is held by teachers who have explained their political views, can be benefited to develop and improve critical thinking skill, and thus, students can learn how to listen to others as well as contrasting opinions. Consequently, with a proper approach of advanced teachers, students develop critical thinking ability and learn listening others respectfully.
The subsequent and related reason why making known of the political and social view is beneficial for students is the relationship between teachers and students. In human relationships, not only the trust is a crutial consideration, but also ideas or thoughts of others are. If teachers make their views on these debatable topics, students will feel closer to their teachers. In fact, people tend to feel comfortable when they know more about others. Additionally, as students know their teacher more, students' attitudes toward the lectures, so further success are employed.
In conclusion, although expressing these critical issues in the class requires a careful explanation of each details, teachers should try to do the best what they can for the benefits of students in their future success. Significant skills which students will need in their academic career and social lives, can be acquired with this. Lastly, students get to know their teacher thanks to sharing these issues to students in the classroom.
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today
- TPO 17 – Independent: A/D? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 76
- tpo 14 salvage logging 88
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO16 (integrated) 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to listen'.
Suggestion: to listen
...lop critical thinking ability and learn listening others respectfully. The subsequent ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, lastly, moreover, so, thus, well, whereas, while, except for, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40616246499 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81100776011 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565826330532 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3773319048 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285292748959 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109981026511 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789330602881 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19392190667 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579963546909 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.