These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time.
Explain why you think this change has happened?
What are the effects of this change in attitude?
In the modern society, people are less care about the items they own. When the older generation choose to use the things untill it completely damaged, by repairing and correcting the damage, but younger people following trend to use and throw. This essay will discuss why people has changed and what are the effects of this.
Nowadays, people tend to become more fashionable and advanced as the technology moves. Mobile phones and clothing for instance, even it has some damages, people show the tendency to change items rather than repair. This occurs due to the lucrative advertisements about the new and upgraded versions. Another reason is that manufacturing companies focus on their revenue instead of maximum life expectancy of items. For example, when people were using the old model television or mobile phones. Although new products are becoming more delicate with less duration of life when the products from the similar company performed well with the maximum efficiency in the past.
The main effects of these kind of behaviour leads to many problems to personal and environmental. In addition, people may lose their skills and attitude to keep the items safe, which may be leads to the tendency to purchase new products often. This may results in the higher expenses without saving money for the future. In addition, these attitude always cause damages to the environment. While throwing the non-biodegradable rubbish to the landfill will result in the pollution. In long-term people suffer with diseases such as asthma and skill allergies. This is the major change happened from the past.
In conclusion, today people tend to get new products rather than repairing the older products. Due to this attitude found ubiquitously among younger generation and which leads to many consequences to environment and thereby cause personal loss.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
- the percentage of daily consumption of fruits and vegetable by UK people in three different yearsThe graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 73
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in modern society.” Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 56
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 100
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Explain why you think this change has happened? What are the effects of this change in attitu 73
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...y in the past. The main effects of these kind of behaviour leads to many problems to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 335, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this attitude' or 'these attitudes'?
Suggestion: this attitude; these attitudes
...ving money for the future. In addition, these attitude always cause damages to the environment...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 391, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lways cause damages to the environment. While throwing the non-biodegradable rubbish ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27609427609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66806071782 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0820395799 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0555555556 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299927554899 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892581575463 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795113917281 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175860222513 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795223872472 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.