The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the Uk who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006.
The bar chart compares the proportion of daily Internet users in four different age groups in the UK between 2003 and 2006.
Overrall, the percentage of young people who used Internet everyday was much higher than those in older groups.
There were above 80% of people age 16 to 24 used Internet everyday in those years. The figure for this group in 2005 was 90% and this was the highest figure shown on this bar chart. By constrast, noone in group of 65 year olds or more used Internet daily in 2003 while only around 13% of them used it in 2005.
The proportions of daily Internet users in 25 to 44 year-olds and 55 to 64 year-olds groups saw a steady growth throughout the period shown. The figure for the former group increased from 50% to 80% while the figure for the latter one rose from 30% to 50%. Adults age 45 to 54 had a fluctuated percentage of Internet users and peaked at 60% in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 67 | view |
- The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 73
- Cycling is a healthier and more environmentally friendly means of transport However it is getting less popular What are the causes and solutions 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 67
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in the UK between 2003 and 2006. Overrall, the percentage of young people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ntage of young people who used Internet everyday was much higher than those in older gro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...higher than those in older groups. There were above 80% of people age 16 to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 71, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...0% of people age 16 to 24 used Internet everyday in those years. The figure for this gro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...round 13% of them used it in 2005. The proportions of daily Internet users ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 746.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44047619048 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25374467928 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577380952381 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.1245689604 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.25 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374317548774 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154594933512 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907161248722 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229438695438 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720655815455 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.