the table below shows the primary funding sources of international studentes in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14.
The table illustrates the number and the percentage of international students who study in the US receive the principal financing sources from 2003/04 to 2013/14
In general, It can be clearly seen that the number of students who have the primary sources of funding from all the sources mentioned witnessed a significant upward during the period of 2003/04 and 2013/14. The principal source of financial support from current employer hit the highest point of 390% for the percentage change over the mentioned years, whereas the figure for other resources fell to a low point of -14% over the years mentioned above
In particular, It could be noticed that the total amount of students who have the principal source of funding from personal and family underwent a dramatic growth by 188,586 , from 2003/04 to 2013/14. Whereas the number of students who have other sources witnessed a slight decline of 4086 students over the year mentioned.
There was a significant increase in the percentage of total the students who have the primary source of financing from current employer and foreign government or university, ranging from 4% to 5%. Whereas
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | Camellia Grande | 67 | view |
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- the table below shows the primary funding sources of international studentes in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14. 67
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14 73
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er resources fell to a low point of -14% over the years mentioned above In p...
^^
Line 9, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ears mentioned above In particular, It could be noticed that the total amoun...
^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y underwent a dramatic growth by 188,586 , from 2003/04 to 2013/14. Whereas the n...
^^
Line 9, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...underwent a dramatic growth by 188,586 , from 2003/04 to 2013/14. Whereas the num...
^^
Line 9, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... by 188,586 , from 2003/04 to 2013/14. Whereas the number of students who have other s...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iversity, ranging from 4% to 5%. Whereas
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26203208556 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68660729539 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48128342246 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 46.0 22.4926829268 205% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.401614416 43.030603864 308% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 246.0 112.824112599 218% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 46.75 22.9334400587 204% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359253879159 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221818673959 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142518303925 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244254088289 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102755508193 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.7 13.2329268293 202% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 33.25 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 10.3012195122 195% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.12 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.4329268293 236% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.4 10.9970731707 186% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.0658536585 244% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.