The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14
The chart illustrates the number and the percentage of international students who studied in the US received the principal financing sources from 2003/04 to 2013/14
For a brief overview, it could be clearly recognized that there was a noticeable tendency towards sponsor by ‘’ Foreign government(?) or university’’, and ‘’current employer’’ during the period between 2003/04 and 2013/14. The number of students who were funded from(?) all the sources witnessed a significant increase in the same period.
In particular, it shows two principal financial assistance were ‘‘ personal(?) and family’’ and ‘‘US college or University’’, which accounted for 90% of funding in 2003/2004, equivalent to 959,672 students. However, it still exists a decrease of 6% over ten years.
Meanwhile, Substantial growth in the number of international students who received financing from ‘ Foreign Government or University’ and ‘Current Employer’ were experienced over the ten-year period, equivalent to 383% and 390%. Even though they still accounted for only a small part of the principal financial assistance, both of the sources have become more important to foreign students in the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | Camellia Grande | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Camellia Grande | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14 73
- the table below shows the primary funding sources of international studentes in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14. 67
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003/04 and 2013/14 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gradually over the mentioned years. In particular, there was a gradual drop ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 77, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... support from personal and family and U.S college or university , a slow rise of ...
^
Line 13, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...and family and U.S college or university , a slow rise of respectively 188,586 and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, whereas, as for, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59146341463 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95622174669 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518292682927 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.843640856 43.030603864 260% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 229.25 112.824112599 203% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 41.0 22.9334400587 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.25 5.23603664747 291% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302450042099 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182674146603 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109329938605 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210010284661 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101829109139 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.4 13.2329268293 192% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.3012195122 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.03 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.