Plow in agriculture
The lecture criticizes the plow, thus the points in the lecture challenge points in the reading. According to the lecture the plow increases crops,but does not conserve for the future. The professor discussed alternating farming, which is better. This is contrast with the reading that the plow is a great invention because it makes possible vast surface agriculture.
Second, the lecture state the overuse of the plow damage to the soil. For example professor said it causes erosion by the wind and water. In the following of the lecture professor state dust bowl run of the soil into the lake and river happened while the plow are extremely. This challenges the point in the reading that tilling soil with a plow improves the soil.
Finally, the professor mentioned the economic advantage of inconsistent farming. He believed its leads to save fuel and labor costs. However passage state the plow reduces the costs and labor requirements of agriculture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | hosseindehnamaki | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
... to the lecture the plow increases crops,but does not conserve for the future. The p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...its leads to save fuel and labor costs. However passage state the plow reduces the cost...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, second, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 1373.03311258 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 157.0 270.72406181 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11464968153 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61680361562 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 145.348785872 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 419.366225166 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9358647188 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.0 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2727272727 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208487105498 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818286349662 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063334431359 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140489912439 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423126781518 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.