The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The table shows the change in attitude, over ten years, of students at a particular university to different aspects of its academic provision.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that during above mentioned years most of the students gave an excellent overview of print resources because its number remained steady.
As is observed from the given data print resources of the university got the highest percentage of positive rating (87- 89%) throughout the years. teaching facility was the second preferred aspect of the university in the early two years while electronic resources became the most preferred aspect of the university jointly with print resources in 2010 with 88% good ratings. Technical quality obtained rating range between 63% - 69% good rating. The most striking feature is that there was a significant rise in the percentage who rated for electronic resources. it started off at 45% in 2000, rose to 72% in 2005 and finally the figure almost doubled in 2010 than 2000.
However, the modules offered by the university had a lower percentage of good ratings in 2010 than in 2000, the reverse was true for the other two aspects.. it is also notable that it was from 2000 to 2010 the building/ teaching facilities showed no change in which this aspect was still at 77.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | Huong Linh | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | Ann Nerissa | 61 | view |
| 2017-12-13 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 61 | view |
| 2015-07-20 | roxanaluca | 80 | view |
| 2014-04-17 | Mubariz | 70 | view |
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 100
- The diagram below show the site of school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of its academic provision. Overall, it can be clearly seen that during above...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ecause its number remained steady. As is observed from the given data print r...
^^
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Teaching
...ve rating 87- 89% throughout the years. teaching facility was the second preferred aspec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 564, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ge who rated for electronic resources. it started off at 45% in 2000, rose to 72%...
^^
Line 13, column 156, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...verse was true for the other two aspects.. it is also notable that it was from 200...
^^
Line 13, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...se was true for the other two aspects.. it is also notable that it was from 2000 t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01860465116 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59212545395 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.400483089 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.888888889 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0818535411451 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367097113413 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04148615253 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0496307272768 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313696849952 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.