The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 ad 2010 about one university.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table compares the outcomes of surveys regarding the ratings given by students in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
Overall, it can be seen that students had similar scorings for Buildings/teaching facilities, while the remaining categories witnessed mixed gradings throughout the given years.
In detail, Print resources saw a gradual growth from 87% to 88% in 2010. Despite dipping a little from 2005 to 2010, the total 88% in the final year was still the joint highest with the Electronic resources (88%), as opposed to the rest. In terms of Electronic resources, there was a sharp swell from 45% in 2000, rocketing to 88% in the end of the term, nearly doubled. Likewise, Teaching quality experienced an upward trend to finish the period at 69%, but there was a minimal decline to 63% in 2005.
By contrast, 'Range of modules offered' exhibited an opposite movement, which meant that there was a steady slid year on year to 27% in 2010 from the beginning 32%. Surprisingly, the ratings for Buildings/Teaching facilities held unaltered at 77% all the time in the question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | Huong Linh | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | Ann Nerissa | 61 | view |
| 2017-12-13 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 61 | view |
| 2015-07-20 | roxanaluca | 80 | view |
| 2014-04-17 | Mubariz | 70 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 51
- The table below gives the information about rail transport in four countries in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 74
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help local community.The believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 90
- Topic: Some people believe that mature employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence are more beneficial to a company. Discuss both views with your own perception. 70
- The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 80
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
need to figure out the main features:
1. Teaching quality/Print resources: keep almost same
2. Electronic resources: up trend
3. Range of modules offered: down trend
4. Buildings/Teaching facilities: identical
-----------------
this is not a good description, it has only 1% difference:
In detail, Print resources saw a gradual growth from 87% to 88% in 2010. Despite dipping a little from 2005 to 2010, the total 88% in the final year was still the joint highest with the Electronic resources (88%), as opposed to the rest.
You can go details greatly, but ignored main features.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 185 200
No. of Characters: 870 1000
No. of Different Words: 116 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.688 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.703 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.59 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 59 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 51 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 35 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.134 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.425 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.715 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.102 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, likewise, regarding, so, still, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01092896175 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92104999453 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644808743169 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2169825576 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116452331383 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532002242426 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810946635802 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852963449958 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105267058126 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.