The argument has ascribed elements of the modern life to be responsible for the problems encountered by people in modern world. Although, it is certainly true that, the challenges such as climate change, rising pollution and nuke wars- which could lead to decimation of life- have begotten due our activities, but one should also consider the development of medical science, science and technology and arts & culture, while concluding the boons and banes of human activities. In my opinion, boons outweigh banes far more.
Firstly, It has took million of years for the evolution of the human race. Undoubtedly, we are the most intelligent race on this planet. Humans have striven to accomplish their need and alleviate themselves. This success has not come overnight to us. It took painstaking efforts and genius of some people to arrive at this stage. Consider for example, how life was during the 18th century. No one is oblivious to the fact that during 18th century people were more inclined to the social life and were considered to be stress free. They also had in-adulterated food supplies and much more better living environment than we today. But despite those facts, the life expectancy, in U.S., during that era was just around 50 years in comparison to 72 years at present. So, what made such momentous difference in average life span? The answer is quite simple, it is the development of our medical science through our relentless efforts.
In addition to that, one average person will usually feel the pace of rapid life today right from the scratch of the day. Rushing to office, working on a computer system, using a mobile for conversation are some the attributes of modern life. But out of this hectic schedule, we get to expand base our learning and understanding. Every other day we face diverse range of challenges which requires us to hone our skills to tackle them.
Om the contrary to that, one might argue that due to fast pace of life, people are compromising with their social life eventually leading to problems such as depression and other cognitive issue. I acknowledge that, yes there some problems related to social life of modern people but those problems could be easily solved by maintaining the right balance in the life.
In conclusion, every situation has some positive and unwanted negative after effects but rapid pace of life in not the only contributing factor. Nonetheless, negative effects are outstripped by the positive ones in this case study.
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 54
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 54
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...igh banes far more. Firstly, It has took million of years for the evolution of t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...anes far more. Firstly, It has took million of years for the evolution of the human...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...d in-adulterated food supplies and much more better living environment than we today. But d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... us to hone our skills to tackle them. Om the contrary to that, one might argue...
^^^
Line 8, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the positive ones in this case study.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nonetheless, so, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01442307692 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6779409892 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.5554569715 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8181818182 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154941800956 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410472178707 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03152402926 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884931114798 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102592520364 0.0667264976115 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.