The sports industry has largely been commercialized and a significant amount of taxpayer's money is spent on the development of players for the sake of bringing trophies and medals. It is often argued by experts and non-experts that instead of spending a huge amount on a handful of sports star, this amount should rather be better invested in campaigns motivating the wider population to adopt a healthy lifestyle and remain physically fit. I completely agree that a country's resources should not be wasted this way and policy-makers are obliged to work out ways that benefit the majority.
Generally speaking, the money spent on initiatives to emphasize the importance of physical exertion has several long term tangible benefits. Firstly, the public who act upon these drives and start taking part in physical activities are less likely to get sick resulting in the reduction of the healthcare budget. As a result, the savings can be allocated to other vital areas such, education and tourism which help to improvise the overall economic conditions of the country. In addition, it greatly increases the productivity and work efficiency of laborers and office workers, providing them the necessary energy and power to accomplish their targets.
Another point worth considering is that the citizens develop positive thinking about lawmakers when they see tax money is spent on positive causes. If a significant amount of money is spent on a few individuals or sectors, it may result in provoking resentment and hatred amongst the group of people because of Inequality. In addition, it is not always possible for sportspersons to secure top positions in international events and if they are unable to perform well, those in government are severely criticized for squandering public funds.
To conclude, expenditure on preparing sportsmen and sportswomen for winning tournaments is considered to be futile when this could be better spent on other areas.
- People spend large amounts of time and money on clothes, hairstyles and make up to change their appearance.Is it important for people to be concerned about the way they look? What are the consequences of focussing on physical appearance? 89
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Many jobs in the home nowadays can be done by machines. Has it brought more advantages than disadvantages? 88
- Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Your local hospital has advertised for people to do unpaid work helping at the hospital. You would like to do some work at the hospital in your free time.Write a letter to the hospital. In your letterexplain why you would like to do unpaid work at the hos 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
The sports industry has largely been commercialize...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, so, well, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30546623794 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95999526081 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620578778135 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.0449230919 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2727272727 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150766530882 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049591196503 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322335620575 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866005946226 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295594246317 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.