Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Around the world, there are different opinions concerning careers. A wide group of individuals prefers to work for the same organization during their whole working life. However, others might argue that working for various organizations tend to have more benefits. This essay deals with the arguments of both sides of this polemical debate before reaching a concluding opinion.
From one point of view, the foremost reason why people choose to work in a particular company might be relationships. As individuals get used to the environment of one company, they built strong and long-lasting relationships with co-workers and even managers. For instance, a professor working in a special lab with his team prefers to remain in that occupation because they know how to handle group work together even though other alternatives might bring more compensation. Furthermore, this makes a comfort zone for them, which abandoning it can have negative impacts on their outputs and productivity. Besides, experts believe that durable relationships lead to job satisfaction. Thus, these groups tend to spend their working life in one organization.
By stark contrast, those who like to switch from one company to another one believe that in this case, they can learn and acquire more. While working for different organizations, individuals seem to grasp a wide range of information as well as become dual-income or more. For example, a software developer tends to get hired by various companies since they love to challenge themselves with complicated tasks. Due to tackling intricate responsibilities, they grow and advance in their careers. Hence, multi-tasking contributes to career advancement for some occupations.
In conclusion, although working for one company might result in pleasure and have merits for some group, others feel contented when they have various duties in different organizations. Nonetheless, it appears to me that workers should select the occupation which satisfy them more based on their responsibilities.
- The line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country 85
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- The line graph shows estimated sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of Dirhams 95
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52733118971 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14277060276 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610932475884 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0020849412 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.117647059 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322381304474 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104829368781 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910749883243 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215202485792 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688760070949 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.