In today's work industry, many jobs have been created compared to last decades. Therefore, a majority of people believe that one should work for a variety of organizations. Others assert to work for the same corporation. Although I agree that we should change our job, I will discuss both perspectives.
On the one hand, maintaining the same job is beneficial to people in terms of relationships as they love and enjoy working as a team with their colleagues. They are more likely to work more effectively and productively with their co-workers. Studies have shown that people who have been working in the same company are always punctual. Who would not be motivated if we are going to see our loved one every day? Moreover, if a person has been working for a lifetime for a particular company then he or she will receive recognition from the company. Who knows she would even be placed into higher executives.
However, advocates to this think that workers should work in different companies. This is due to the higher salaries in certain places. It is indeed true that we should change our job for own good. Besides, it is also a good way to experience a different workforce and learn various skills in other organizations because they could learn more and useful than the previous corporation. For example, my friend worked in a Samsung company before and now he shifted his job to Apple company. He said that working in Apple is more worth it as he gained new capabilities and wisdom there.
Why band 5 only??
Why band 5 only??
Minimum four paragraphs
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Who” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l receive recognition from the company. Who knows she would even be placed into hig...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80694980695 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7433023396 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57528957529 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5025684028 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8125 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321806971708 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111083013517 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876042837943 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230196895452 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426999705353 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.