do you agree or disagree with the following statement ?To improw the quality of the education, university should spend more money on salaries for university professors. use specific reason and examples to support your ansewr.
That the quality of education plays an important role in the future of students and excellent education makes them find their favorite job is the undeniable fact. Should we realize the significance of university professors in the quality of education, we ponder over their life situation and how much their salaries are and the influence their salaries in the quality of education much more scrupulously. the life situation of professors and, weather if they have wealthy life help that they will have better performance in university has recently been the topic of debate among experts.
I believe that if a professor earnt a lot of money they will do their job better. and these are my justification, to begin with, I had two professors when I was a student in the university, One of them had a good life and the other had a lot of money-matter problems. the earlier professor had good performance in the class and he had good relationships with students, in the other side, another professor could not do her responsibilities very good and students did not satisfy of his performances in the university, therefore, I believe that the situation of private life has influence on the quality of our work. the second reason why I advocate this point of view liaising with the fact that a university professor studies the whole of his or her life and spends the time of life in the university and helps to educate persons of the society. If s/he earns much money, s/he will do his or her work better. I believe that respecting the teachers is the duty government. the last but not the last, professors do not have another source to earn money and the university should solve their financial problems because if they do not have concentrate in their job, we threat the future of students and the quality of the works the will do because low-quality education result weak engineer and doctors in the future.
Having discussion this point of view I would rather look at it from another perspective because a coin has two sides as we, some people do their job because they love it high salaries absorb people that do not that job and only do that for money.
By taking all the above-mentioned arguments into consideration the following conclusion can drown about the issue, underestimating the significance of the life situation and having wilfully life is not logical. attending to the issue meticulously contributes to paying university professors more than the past unless they have a good life to have better performance in the university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-08 | salarmoheb | 73 | view |
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement ? parents are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past.use specific reason and examples to support your ansewr. 70
- Why go to university? 73
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
- tpo 50,q2 3
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ty of education much more scrupulously. the life situation of professors and, weath...
^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...of money they will do their job better. and these are my justification, to begin wi...
^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...her had a lot of money-matter problems. the earlier professor had good performance ...
^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...s influence on the quality of our work. the second reason why I advocate this point...
^^^
Line 3, column 974, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ng the teachers is the duty government. the last but not the last, professors do no...
^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Attending
...nd having wilfully life is not logical. attending to the issue meticulously contributes t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, so, therefore, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86175115207 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89048572526 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453917050691 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.0515583228 48.9658058833 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.307692308 100.406767564 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3846153846 20.6045352989 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176434390449 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673244896341 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487526644614 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105742889409 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345323462598 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 11.7677419355 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.