No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of sticking into the ambitious dreams and try to pursue that. Similarly, there are pros and cons on focusing into the realistic goal. If I were forced to choose among the above, I would definitely choose to follow my own ambitious rather than taking a realistic goal. It is my firm belief that trying to pursue your ambitious dream makes you success in long run for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, sticking into the ambitious dreams always make you happier, which will support you to pursue your goal. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. About ten years ago, I was in confusion about my career for what to choose. My passion was lying on physics, but there was no wider scope in it. Anyway I decided to follow the career which I do have a penchant over. It used to be so much fun studying physics and cogitate over numerical and theories, which always made me happier. At those time, I never thought whether it has a good career or not. Later on I graduated master degree with distinction and got highly paid job in Acme Engineering College which was my dream. This would not have been possible if I had not followed my ambitious dream.
Secondly, choosing your ambitious dreams always help you to learn so many things in your life, which will definitely help you to become an erudite personality. Drawing from my own experience, I always wanted to be a good writer, for that I used study too many philosophical book. As a result, I developed a strong command over the words and coherence between the sentences. Now, I am able to write implicit word so that a magazine is hiring me to write for them. It is certainly to see why choosing your own dream always help you to become a knowledgeable person, which ultimately helped me to boost up into my career.
Thirdly, although I prefer to follow my own dream there some advantages of choosing a realistic goals, which gives results in short period but not fruitful in long-run. For instance, one of my friend started a poultry farm 3 years before, which has a high demand in local town. After six months he covered all of his investments and started to get advantage after that. After one year, he became very successful but recently due to the hymn of bird-flu people are not consuming it. So, his business goes rapidly down and he has bankrupted. This happened because of choosing a realistic goal.
In light of the above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that following an ambitious dream is always fruitful in long-run.
- Some people believe school cafeterias should stop selling soft drinks and other high sugar drinks while others think students should have a choice in what they drink Which option do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Describe an object that is very special in your life Explain why this object is important to you Include details and examples in your explanation 86
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruism 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'goal'?
Suggestion: goal
...some advantages of choosing a realistic goals, which gives results in short period bu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, first, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, third, thirdly, for instance, in short, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6498951782 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55474626157 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530398322851 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7228109461 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.72 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.08 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264108645699 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695037924753 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563082345374 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1403131407 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275096097438 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.