Some people believe that corporal punishment will spoil the children. While others believe that, it is the best method of teaching discipline to children. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The question of whether a corporal penalty is a useful method of teaching children has become a controversial subject amongst the public. Some people think that it is the most effective way to educate teens while others suppose that it has negative impacts on children’s development. In my opinion, I disagree with the use of physical pain.
On the one hand, I can understand why someone is in favour of physical punishment. Firstly, compared to alternative methods such as suspension, expulsion and community services, corporal punishment has direct effects. For example, a student may stop talking or disrupting a class for a while if his teacher spanks him, and then the teacher could go back to teaching without taking too much time managing a student’s behaviour. Secondly, physical pain is considered as a strong deterrent for the person who receives corporal punishment and for those who witness it. As a result, they would feel deterred from engaging in certain activities that attract physical punishment.
On the other hand, I believe that corporal punishment is not a good idea due to adverse effects on children’s cognition it causes. Obviously, students who are anxious about being physically punished are inhibited from exploring their physical and social world which play a vital role in their cognitive development. Consequently, these students could be less likely to extend their cognitive skills. Moreover, it will be counterproductive if parents use physical pain as a method of teaching their kids. As if parents try to modify children’s bad behaviours through inflicting pain, then these children are likely to do the same to others when they want to influence ion other’s actions.
In conclusion, many people put forward the use of a physical method of education. However, I think that we take actions against this method because of unpredictable consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-31 | Lee Hwa | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-30 | Lee Hwa | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | Shahboz Rustamov | 87 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | daoquynhtram122 | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | daoquynhtram122 | 61 | view |
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- University education should be free to everyone, regardless of income. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- in the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether a corporal penalty is a useful method o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35099337748 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1469220334 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609271523179 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8823680107 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.733333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2666666667 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223396068981 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726601851434 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667028315635 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133005627305 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676045256026 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.