Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree/disagree?
With the continuous increase in crime rates worldwide, opinions have diverged on the issue of how to deal with criminals. While there are some valid arguments for putting them in prison, I still believe that vocational training and rehabilitation are better methods in order to reduce crimes.
Advocates usually argue that criminals should be punished by imprisonment. Firstly, it is recognized that crime is a risk to society and we cannot mix criminals with other citizens in the community. Therefore, sending them to prison can alleviate society’s fear of criminals. Moreover, many criminals are afraid of imprisonment and being put in prison means that their profile and family members would be negatively affected. Consequently, this kind of punishment would prevent them from committing crimes again.
Despite the aforementioned arguments, I support the view that training and education can help to reduce the high level of crime. Criminals who have already been in prison would possibly continue committing crimes once they are set free. Prisons then act as a university of crimes, which some people might learn more and create some new relationships with other criminals to commit a bigger case. Besides, it is poverty, illiteracy, and unemployment that are the roots of some petty crimes. So providing vocational training and education for petty offenders such as traffickers or shoplifters could decrease the crime rate. Furthermore, prisons are expensive to maintain so the government should allocate financial budget more for education and healthcare in order to prohibit people from the idea of committing crimes.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the government should offer education and job training for criminals so that they can find a job and help fighting crimes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-16 | thecarromato | 56 | view |
- Many people think that advertisements aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree/disagree? 61
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree/disagree? 61
- Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generations companies should encourage high-level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree/disagree? Why? 80
- In many countries nowadays, people still live with their parents after marriage. Do you think this trend has more advantages or disadvantages? 84
- Some people think instead of preventing climate change, we should find ways to live with it. To what extent do you agree/disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46428571429 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95030264791 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1669487689 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263739834423 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850820291178 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517025208994 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166198329408 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305255692556 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.