in the past, it was easier to identify a career that leads to a secure and successful future.
In the last 30 years, the concept of choosing a secure career has been brought to public attention. Some people believe that in the past, it was easier for adults to opt for a career that leads to a successful future; however, others claim that people today could properly identify satisfying and secure careers. From a personal perspective, the latter point of view carries more weight given that people today are more educated and adapted to technology. Below I will strive to explain my supporting points in more detail.
The first and foremost point, although people in the past had various job opportunities, they were not highly educated. One the other hand, recently, educating children has been improved drastically. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on that schools in the developed countries, such as Canada and the United States started to teach their students ideas and concepts instead of facts, which improves students' ability to explore topics and integrate information. Furthermore, this approach could show students how to learn instead of teaching a specific curriculum. To put it in other words, students could be actively participate in a class, not just passively, which enhances students' ability to think and augments their creativity and imagination. Consequently, proper education nowadays could amplify students' ability to get a secure career and build up their future with prosperity.
Next, coupled with functional education, technological innovations are another noticeable reason to attain satisfying careers. Even though advanced technology is very intricate, adults could adapt to it quickly. For instance, high school students could use searching websites, such as Google and YouTube, to collect information about their future careers. Provided that youngsters use the internet, they could know the market need, which helps them to make optimal decisions. Therefore, technology is essential to make it easy for young people to identify secure careers because it could not only promote their expeience, but also boot their fundamental knowledge.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, it is easier for people today to opt for a career that leads to a secure future. It is suggested for schools design learning activities that help their students to choose a satisfying career, yet a secure one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | kameice | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Christine hanna | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | amirbahman | 73 | view |
- tpo 54 3
- In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure and successful future? do you agree or disagree? 90
- people attend schools for many reasons. do you think why people attend schools 73
- do you agree or disagree? people benefit more from traveling in their own countries than traveling to foreign countries? 73
- do you agree or disagree the young kids are impolite or unkind than yey were fifty years ago? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a satisfying career, yet a secure one.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39189189189 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79575489531 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589189189189 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1100989486 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.352941176 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223332166286 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672939777741 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113103981895 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15709937712 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11182568034 0.0645574589148 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.