Many people think that the government should spend money to explode the outer space, while others believe it's a waste of public money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the current era of globalization, various studies and research about life outside territorial have carried out. Consequently, some people encourage the authority to implement such crucial studies while some concur that it is not worth spending money on that. I agree with those who contend that sponsoring outer space projects gains in importance amongst the virtues. This essay will discuss both perspectives.
On the one hand, instead of providing financial support for those costly exploration, the government should pay heed to people who are in need. It is unfair for people with limited income to live under derived conditions while the government decides to neglect them to conduct such projects. A case in point is that North Korea is a well-known country for its weapons and outer space experiments, notwithstanding people here find it harsh to make ends meet and end up suffering from detrimental diseases.
On the other hand, those projects have a great majority of merits that cannot be overlooked. Firstly, the colossal developments of science could witness a skyrocketing rise. Humans, especially children, always wonder whether there is life outside the Earth or not. By investing money for space exploration, it could help not only people acknowledge enormous space also stimulate the impulse of children to assimilate knowledge. Secondly, with the correct guidance and insulation, plenty of space disasters can be noticed beforehand. Then, people could diminish the damage affecting humanity. For instance, in 1981, NASA (USA) found flying objects from space coming to the earth’s surface, that finding helped to save a department of people who lived there.
In conclusion, all the space studies have both pros and cons but overall, the benefits they bring to the enhancement of humanity outweigh the downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | Lê Thị Hoài Như | 89 | view |
- Maps 78
- Education 11
- Bar chart 78
- Some cities have vehicle-free days, when private cars, trucks, motorcycles are banned in the city center. Public transportation like buses, taxis, and metros are advised. To what extent do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Art classes like paiting and drawing are important to students' development and should be made compulsory in high school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39236111111 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85922267775 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649305555556 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9876750415 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.533333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19546750439 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556800458061 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411481673196 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105717829073 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342646524942 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.