chinese urban expenditure
The pie charts illustrate what percentages the urban chinese people spent in the years 1995 and 2011 in major categories.
As it can be seen from both year’s data that they spent most of their money for food, namely, 50% in 1995 and 36% in 2011. The other expenses are smaller compared to this category. In 1995, the urban chinese spent 14% in clothing, which stands second to food expenses. Among the other categories in the same year, recreation, education and culture accounted for a considerable percentage of expenditure, which is 10%. The rest of the expenses are taken up by residential,transportation and communication, medicine and household facilities each of which account for less than 10%.
Looking at the chart for 2011, after food comes the expense of transportation and communication, which has increased substantially (14%). Percentage of clothing expense has decreased as compared to 1995, which is now 11%, whereas recreation and education expenditure has increased. Among the rest, they had to spend more in medicine. The others stand for roughly the same proportions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | Shahrear59 | 78 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- hydroelectric power plant 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 67
- The two maps below show an island , before and after the construction of some tourist facillities. 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , transportation
...the expenses are taken up by residential,transportation and communication, medicine and househo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3302570839 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6792330311 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129758774565 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510420406651 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845808092777 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105695529249 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660534319736 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.