Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
<a class="_1Uso5bM8J5Wni-kP-8_HfA" style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); cursor: pointer; color: rgb(29, 160, 221); font-family: Tondo, Arial, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: pre-line;"><mark style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(201, 237, 222); padding: 4px;">Leaders should be most focused on gaining approval and respect from their peers because those are the people that can help them to accomplish more goals.</mark><div class="_1JVNgLgYDN-dhuxUG3owf0" style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(146, 218, 189); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); display: inline-block;"><span class="_1Lk9SHdFB0Ittdc0oBRmJI" style="box-sizing: border-box; align-items: center; display: flex; height: 28px; justify-content: center; width: 28px;">1</span></div></a><span style="color: rgb(75, 80, 78); font-family: Tondo, Arial, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: pre-line;"> Having good moral judgment is a great thing, but making decisions based on your own personal beliefs may not be a good reflection of how the entire group feels. Employees could disagree with the beliefs of the manager and then not be great at their job, in the boss’ eyes. People are more successful at work when they believe similar things that their peers and co-workers believe because they can work together more easily.
</span><a class="_1Uso5bM8J5Wni-kP-8_HfA" style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); cursor: pointer; color: rgb(29, 160, 221); font-family: Tondo, Arial, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: pre-line;"><mark style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(201, 237, 222); padding: 4px;">Leaders should not use morality as a way to make judgments because employees may not agree and therefore won’t work hard for that boss.</mark><div class="_1JVNgLgYDN-dhuxUG3owf0" style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(146, 218, 189); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); display: inline-block;"><span class="_1Lk9SHdFB0Ittdc0oBRmJI" style="box-sizing: border-box; align-items: center; display: flex; height: 28px; justify-content: center; width: 28px;">2</span></div></a><span style="color: rgb(75, 80, 78); font-family: Tondo, Arial, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: pre-line;"> If they don’t work hard, then the company won’t succeed against it’s competitiors. That is the purpose of a company.
A leader is supposed to be a reflection of the people that they respresent. That is not always possible, but it becomes even more difficult when the leader uses morality as a way to make decisions for everyone. That isn’t fair since people believe different things. </span><a class="_1Uso5bM8J5Wni-kP-8_HfA" style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); cursor: pointer; color: rgb(29, 160, 221); font-family: Tondo, Arial, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: pre-line;"><mark style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(201, 237, 222); padding: 4px;">Also, morality could be religious in nature which is not allowed at work for a reason.</mark><div class="_1JVNgLgYDN-dhuxUG3owf0" style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(146, 218, 189); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); display: inline-block;"><span class="_1Lk9SHdFB0Ittdc0oBRmJI" style="box-sizing: border-box; align-items: center; display: flex; height: 28px; justify-content: center; width: 28px;">3</span></div></a><span style="color: rgb(75, 80, 78); font-family: Tondo, Arial, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: pre-line;"> It causes people to dislike one another and breeds distrust between co-workers.
If people work with others, including their leader, and the whole group shares those beliefs, then those beliefs will help to shape the way that the organization makes decisions. </span><a class="_1Uso5bM8J5Wni-kP-8_HfA" style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); cursor: pointer; color: rgb(29, 160, 221); font-family: Tondo, Arial, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: pre-line;"><mark style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(201, 237, 222); padding: 4px;">This is important because it leads to better decision making--decisions that are productive and benefit the whole group.</mark><div class="_1JVNgLgYDN-dhuxUG3owf0" style="box-sizing: border-box; background-color: rgb(146, 218, 189); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); display: inline-block;"><span class="_1Lk9SHdFB0Ittdc0oBRmJI" style="box-sizing: border-box; align-items: center; display: flex; height: 28px; justify-content: center; width: 28px;">4</span></div></a><span style="color: rgb(75, 80, 78); font-family: Tondo, Arial, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: pre-line;"> People that don’t share the same beliefs, especially ones that work for someone with different beliefs, usually ends up quitting or stealing or something else negative to make up for their dislike.
Therefore, is is far better to have the respect from one’s peers than it is to have good moral judgment. Good moral judgment usually makes leaders judgmental in a negative way, which doesn’t help anyone because people stop being productive. Morals have no place at work at all. That is why religion is not permitted as a drivng force behind decision-making.</span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps, a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bact 43
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wi 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 12, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...e up for their dislike. Therefore, is is far better to have the respect from one...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 164, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...dgment usually makes leaders judgmental in a negative way, which doesn't help anyone because...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 5228.0 2235.4752809 234% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 650.0 442.535393258 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 8.04307692308 5.05705443957 159% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.04926703274 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 7.0505837603 2.79657885939 252% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.367692307692 0.4932671777 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1249.2 704.065955056 177% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 23.0359550562 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 479.194527886 60.3974514979 793% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 348.533333333 118.986275619 293% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.3333333333 23.4991977007 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123706618256 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637210538435 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459821099969 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112643481362 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204858700062 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 38.1 14.1392134831 269% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 2.45 48.8420337079 5% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 7.92365168539 216% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.6 12.1743820225 194% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 30.24 12.1639044944 249% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 75.0 11.8971910112 630% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 11.2143820225 171% => OK
text_standard: 24.0 11.7820224719 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.