As global trade increases between different countries many daily necessities are produced in other countries Such goods are usually transported a long distance do the benefits of this trend outweigh it s drawbacks

Essay topics:

As global trade increases between different countries, many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Such goods are usually transported a long distance .do the benefits of this trend outweigh it's drawbacks?

Globalization has converted the big planet earth into a small global village. The boost in trade has led to many essentials being produced in other countries in order to transport them to large distances. I believe this trend has both advantages and disadvantages; however advantages outweigh its drawbacks. This essay will discuss both sides along with my opinion.

To begin with, considering the advantages of trade of different types of goods, primarily, the essential materials transported by various nations result in reducing the scarcity of resources of one nation. If the raw material of some essential goods is not available in one country, it can be supplied by other nation which is having bulk of it. Moreover, it also improves the international relations of the nations, which are trading with each other as they are fulfilling the needs of each other. To exemplify, China is the largest trading partner of India as India imports its major commodities such as electronic equipments , iron and steel from China. Hence, trade improves the relations between the partner countries and it also fulfills the material needs.

However, trading of goods has its downside also as if the goods are imported from other nations, the local market suffers. To elaborate, the goods which are available at cheap prices in other countries if imported will result in the downfall of the national market, which is providing those goods at higher rates. For example, mobile phones, which are available in China at low prices, are imported by India mainly from this country resulting in the downgrading of national mobile market. Hence, there is a negative side of trading between different nations but the positive side cannot be neglected as it Is far more brighter than the other side.

In conclusion, the trade of goods between different nations in order to fulfill their requirements has more positive aspects than the negative ones. So , trade should be carried out with proper rules and regulations to reduce the loss of local markets.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (11 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-22 Chirag Bhardwaj 73 view
2020-08-20 nainsi1991@gmail.com 47 view
2019-10-19 Navkiran kaur 85 view
2018-11-14 bhatvishal@ 62 view
Essays by user Navkiran kaur :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ommodities such as electronic equipments , iron and steel from China. Hence, trad...
^^
Line 5, column 645, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s electronic equipments , iron and steel from China. Hence, trade improves the re...
^^
Line 9, column 614, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'brighter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: brighter
...e side cannot be neglected as it Is far more brighter than the other side. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...itive aspects than the negative ones. So , trade should be carried out with proper...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18373493976 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6955370996 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6868856033 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.733333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192926444506 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694237191927 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033967068501 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123458016944 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308987340281 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.