TPO 27: integrated writing task
The main topic of both the reading passage and the lecture is about the origin of the little ice age. The author of the reading proposes three possible causes of this period. However, the lecturer refutes all three hypotheses mentioned by the lecturer as they are not based on new information.
First of all, the lecturer mentions the disruption of the Gulf Stream disruption which may have been caused by melting the glaciers that sent a large amount of cold water into the Gulf Stream. The speaker, on the other hand, rejects this hypothesis by pointing out that the Gulf Stream affects Europe and North America, while the little ice age had occurred in the southern hemisphere in areas like South Africa and New Zealand. Hence the Gulf Stream would not be a potential cause of the little ice age.
Secondly, the author claims that volcanic eruptions during little ice age would be another potential cause. Volcanic eruption releases gases, dust, and dark clouds into the atmosphere which leads to blockage of the sunlight. In that era, this phenomenon might have led to a dramatic decrease in temperature. Conversely, the lecturer argues that volcanic eruptions should release enough dust in atmosphere to drastically reduce the temperature. If it was the cause of little ice age it would have produced noticeable visual effects like colorful sunsets or brown snow that routinely happened. However, these effects were not documented in that period.
Finally, the lecturer mentions that a decrease in human populations in that period of time had led to the development of forests that absorbed carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and hence reduced the amount of greenhouse gas in it which led to a decrease in greenhouse effect which could keep the earth warm. The lecturer disproves this claim by explaining that there was not enough time that this phenomenon takes place as the human population rapidly recovered to its previous level and they had to cut down trees in order to have enough field for their crops. Hence, forests were not long enough to cause long term global cooling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-10 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | Allenwlh | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Kamyar Mirzaei | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | suyun | 80 | view |
| 2021-02-25 | alibenvari | 80 | view |
- TPO 43 : Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.— Wait until the clas 60
- TPO17: integrated writing task 73
- TPO 22: integrated writing task 73
- TPO30: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 73
- TPO 34: integrated writing task 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...reas like South Africa and New Zealand. Hence the Gulf Stream would not be a potentia...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...a decrease in human populations in that period of time had led to the development of forests t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 349.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99713467049 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48762753171 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518624641834 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.1386506727 49.2860985944 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.266666667 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460202354044 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14103088986 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746846221557 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252928074295 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756654162729 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.