Inner city traffic congestion is still a serious problem in many cities. Much of this congestion is caused by there being simply too many cars on our roads. What could be done to encourage people not to use their cars?
Various negative effects stem from the increasing number of cars on the roads in cities all over the world, traffic congestion being one of them. Possible ways to encourage people to stop using cars will be discussed in this essay.
Perhaps the immediate step could involve providing to the city dwellers a better alternative. If buses or underground were as comfortable as personal cars are usually considered, most people would definitely choose them to commute. Possible improvements can include equipping buses or subway carriages with free Wi-Fi access, ACs, and power sockets, what is currently done in Moscow. Lower ticket prices and applications to track vehicles in real-time could also make public transport more popular.
Another remedy might be the development of cycling infrastructure. Bicycles are the cheapest means of transport and also cause absolutely no adverse effects to either the environment, or the city traffic. Building special bicycle roads, starting bicycle sharing companies and launching mobile applications for easier access could undoubtedly make people, especially youngsters, use fewer cars. For instance, bicycle-sharing companies proved very successful in Beijing, where half of the city population uses them instead of cars.
The final response could be initiating ecological campaigns and increasing the awareness of the environmental issues caused by excessive car usage, such as atmosphere pollution or the greenhouse effect. If popular online bloggers or other influencers participate in such campaigns in the media, they could attract attention of people from all over the world. Greta Thunberg’s case shows, that even one person’s actions can make a big difference.
To sum up, possible answers to the city congestion problem could involve improving the public transportation system, developing the bicycle infrastructure and launching environment awareness campaigns.
- The volcanic island growth cycle 68
- We often hear that new technology presents a threat to our traditions In what ways however can new technologies help maintain our traditions 77
- We often hear that new technology presents a threat to our traditions In what ways however can new technologies help maintain our traditions 77
- Pie chartTopic: Time spent on leisure activities by men and women between the age of 21 and 40 , in the US. 78
- A coal plant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80985915493 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06630708492 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669014084507 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8734358123 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251703368674 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799254321277 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634917798196 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137658012548 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793809166599 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.