The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The bar graph illustrates the percentage of people in UK who ate five portions of fruits and vegetables per day from 2001 to 2008.
At first glance to the graph it is clear that in 8 years womens’ percentage was the most as the consumer of five portions of fruit and vegetables. After women come men and children, respectively. Except children, proportion increased in the other two categories until 2006, after which they started to fall gradually. In 2001, little more than 20% of women ate five portions of fruits and vegetables which increased in a regular trend that peaked in the year 2006 to about 35%. Then it decreased to 30% in 2008.
Percentage of men were roughly the same from 2001 to 2003, followed by a considerable increase in 2004 that continued until 2006, when it stagnated at around 28% but decreased a little from 2007 to 2008.
The percentage of children also shows almost the same trend as men. It was the same from 2001 to 2003, a little more than 10%. In 2004 it had a significant increase in percentage that peaked in 2007 at about 25% which slightly decreased in the following year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-30 | MichaelP | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | cutecutecue | view | |
| 2021-08-15 | nami | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | prathamp114 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | rojababa | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below show the statges and equipment used in the cement making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 67
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 67
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroleectric power plant. 56
- A recent study shows that people living on the continent of North America suffer 9 times more chronic fatigue and 31 times more chronic depression than do people living on the continent of Asia. Interestingly, Asians, on average, eat 20 grams of soy per d 40
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67676767677 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65035568685 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510101010101 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.9732007717 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361480000929 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148420259532 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.209673023219 0.0843802449381 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291034810706 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.267699127137 0.0819641961636 327% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.