International travel is becoming cheaper and cheaper, and more countries are now opening their doors to foreign visitors. Do you think that the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
It is clear that international travel trend has substantially increased recently because many governments adopted policies associated with opening their doors to foreigners and the travel cost is more affordable. While this trend has some advantages, I believe that the disadvantages can not be outweighed.
On the one hand, the increase in the number of foreign travelers helps to improve native residents’ lives and enhance the national image. From an economic perspective, if there are more foreign visitors, indigenous dwellers can grow their businesses based on traditional handicrafts. This trend acts as a remedy for unemployment and poverty in particular nations, and therefore, the economic situation in attractions where attract many visitors has been significantly improved. Furthermore, international travel is actually an instrument that governments use to propagate the national traditions. In other words, opening the national doors to foreign visitors helps to spread intangible traditional heritages out the rest of the world such as a dance, songs and even belief.
On the other hand, in a sensible way, it is apparent that there are many environmental and economic issues derived from foreign tourists. Firstly, the increase of the amount of travelling tours would cause locally environmental degradation. For example, many natives’ lives and attractions have been negatively impacted stem from spitting and littering indiscriminately of foreign visitors. Secondly, governments open their national doors to foreign visitors partly is to promote native products, meanwhile, some tourists prefer bringing their own goods which sometimes illegally. In the American customs, there are tons of agricultural products, which are ground and removed every year due to illegal hiding. Some of them used to spread serious outbreaks for the whole of American agriculture.
In conclusion, travelling other nations become cheaper and governments also express a harmony with foreign visitors through policies. Although it is beneficial that countries open doors, I think that the disadvantages obviously overweigh the advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-23 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Phạm Phú Trường | 89 | view |
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called pentland from 1950 and 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below 15
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012. 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas Do you think it is a negative or positive development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...actually an instrument that governments use to propagate the national traditions. I...
^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sensible way" with adverb for "sensible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s and even belief. On the other hand, in a sensible way, it is apparent that there are many env...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in particular, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85668789809 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18768173767 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576433121019 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3858336292 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.6 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286848064401 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847956912795 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641674379615 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190702480541 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066780474492 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.