Some people think that it is vital to donate money in constructing to new railway line, while others believe that improving the existing one is better. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
In the salad days of the millennium the society is polarised almost equally, regarding the notion whether it is substantial to spend enormous amount of capital in developing the new railway tracks for swift movement of trains between two regions or beside, the monetary funds which is provided by government should be utilized in improving the existing transportation system. Different people have the distinct mindset. The following paragraph would shed light on both the view before giving the final verdict.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad of things to be shared in its favor. First and foremost, with the evolution in technology and modern engineering, certain marvels provided the world to commute between two places which are distant in no time. As a result of Tesla founder and Managing Director, "Alon Musk" had invented a new technology known as Hyperloop which runs on a specialized track in enclosed tunnels. Secondly, there is an essential need of such capital to be invested which in turn benefits the mammoth population of the country. Consequently, travel would be completed in less time and it also proves to be convenient, comfortable and safe.
Shifting towards the second school of thought, it is also true that masses won't be able to travel with these upcoming technologies because rather they would be extravagant. Hence, the law enforcement agency should plan for a backup options as motorways which is the backbone of any nation. Not only metropolitan cities are connected with the highway, but also small towns are joined. Therefore, the government should spend funds in building smooth roads equipped with dazzling street lamps. Moreover, enhancement should be enforced to upgrade the government buses so each individual find the seat comfortable with the meliorate facility and the discovery of routes must be carried out.
In conclusion, there are many supporters who state that investing in new technologies sound rubbish to them and they are only satisfied with modern state of art improvement but my argument proves that ameliorate version of transport is far best to travel as it is less time-consuming.
Some people think that it is vital to donate money in constructing to new railway line, while others believe that improving the existing one is better. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-23 | Naman Kumar Singh | 78 | view |
- Many children these days have their own mobile phones.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 56
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 84
- For some people, consumer goods become the most important thing in life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage 11
- For some people, consumer goods become the most important thing in life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage 11
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 615, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...dividual find the seat comfortable with the meliorate facility and the discovery of routes mu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 7.0 357% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 965.302439024 208% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 381.0 196.424390244 194% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25984251969 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 3.73543355544 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80898269499 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 106.607317073 214% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59842519685 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 283.868780488 215% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.9924460041 43.030603864 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226401454749 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904091149556 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198594806209 0.0843802449381 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235689742192 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.38488475827 0.0819641961636 470% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 40.7170731707 278% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.