Some people think schools should educate pupils according to their academic ability, and others believe pupils with different abilities should be educated together. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the salad days of the millennium, the society is polarised almost equally, regarding the notion that weather academic institutions should train the scholars according to their good performance or the children should be coached together. Different people have their distinct mindset. The following paragraph would shed light on the both the views before giving the final note.
To commence with the notion, their are myriad of things to be shared in it's favor. First and foremost, it could be good approach, while teaching the student according to their ability. As a result, the teacher have to put less effort and at the same time the juvenile are going to perceive the knowledge. Secondly, there would be greater competition among the scholar. Consequently, the schools will be providing the bright gems as level of intellect between children would be at the peak.
Shifting towards the second school of thought, the youngster with distinct abilities shall be educated together because adolescent pupils are very creative. Hence, the mixture of the scholar with great extent of knowledge and other skills would be required in the school. Moreover, only great mind is not required to capture the aim sports and other parametres also help to complete the hurdles. Therefore, all the activities like sports, cultural, literary skills are also required.
Having discussed the arguments and the counter arguments , I would like to infer that pupils with differential abilities will be more beneficial because the scholars with bad result will not get offended while they are studying with brilliant students. To conclude, there are many supporters those say that youth should be educated according to there academic ability but my argument proves that all candidates of differential abilities should be educated because this the most appropriate way to deal this situation
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | zhila Emami | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Naman Kumar Singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Naman Kumar Singh | 61 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 73
- The chart displays the quantity of oil production and consumption in million barrels per day in seven areas of the world in the year 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant. 73
- For some people, consumer goods become the most important thing in life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage 11
- The chart displays the quantity of oil production and consumption in million barrels per day in seven areas of the world in year 2005 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 55
- The chart below shows the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to England in 2000 and 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the views before giving the final note. To commence with the notion, their are...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efore giving the final note. To commence with the notion, their are myri...
^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... To commence with the notion, their are myriad of things to be shared in it...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral, literary skills are also required. Having discussed the arguments and the c...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the arguments and the counter arguments , I would like to infer that pupils with ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35353535354 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64666197364 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4087819023 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364380737781 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101395740387 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711731805622 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197913961683 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562493572771 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.