The reading suggest that a Professor having reputation on TV is a good thing. However, the lecture opposes with this view and provides three supporting points.
Firstly, reading says that a professor on TV gets to share is point of views to larger audience and in doing so the professor seems to get a reputation of a luminary. While, the lecture states that, the professor who are often on TV are not consider serious and matter of fact, they are not even called for conferences and are just considered as entertainers rather than educators.
Secondly, the reading says when professor go on Air they get more publicity for themselves and for the university they are working which in turns get more students excited about the university and indeed get more donation for research. However, the lecture states that these professors don’t do actual research as most of their time is consumed in traveling and preparing notes for their TV interview so there is not much time for them to conduct their research and provide concrete results.
Thirdly, the reading supports that the professor gives out knowledge to the general public and helps them in developing interest in the field. While, the lecture opposes this view and states that public do not benefit from these lectures and its just pointless as TV channels don't want serious content and TV channels are more into entertainment business so they cut down the professors content accordingly.
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs wer 80
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways 63
- A person should never make an important decision alone. 60
- The rise of convenience food has helped people keep up with the speed of modern life.Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five-year period. 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
The reading suggest that a Professor having reputation on T...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ary. While, the lecture states that, the professor who are often on TV are not co...
^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
... professor who are often on TV are not consider serious and matter of fact, they are no...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duct their research and provide concrete results. Thirdly, the reading support...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...he professor gives out knowledge to the general public and helps them in developing interest i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew and states that public do not benefit from these lectures and its just pointle...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s and its just pointless as TV channels dont want serious content and TV channels ar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02892561983 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63549883482 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52479338843 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7862098152 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.125 110.228320801 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.25 21.698381199 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218227274373 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905239011693 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495426378793 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127343798385 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613493647293 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.