There has been no time in history where scientists have to face an ethical dilemma over whether in vivo testing on animals is morally justified or it is otherwise. On the one hand, experimentation on non-human animals is oftentimes deemed ruthless, let alone inhumane. However, on the other hand, imposing a ban on animal research could carry potential adverse implications as fas as human's sake is concerned.
With respect to the abolishment of animal testing, the matter in question comes down to animal welfare. It is apparent that every living creatures from primitive bacteria to socially complex chimpanzees are brought to this Earth with equal rights to exist. In spite of this implied contract of equity, humans throughout the course of time repeatedly rid other animals of freedoms by means of hunting or domesticating. On top of that, we now breed and keep certain classes of animals, namely rodents and primates, in laboratory settings and take their life for scientific purposes. Thus concerns are raised about whether such deed as dissecting live mammals is considered animal abuse. As long as the academic community persists in exploiting animals, not only are regulations needed to standardize animal care, but governmental supervision would also be of the essence.
Despite the evidently clear moral downsides, substantial practical applications are undeniable. Conducting trials of a newly discovered substance on other organisms instead of directly on the human body results in fewer preventable and unnecessary deaths. Based on the aftermath of the experiment, the prototype of a hypothesized drug can be either withdrawn or modified so that adverse reactions will not occur in humans. For instance, even though a pharmaceutical company came up with a chemical agent which was theoretically safe on papers, the resultant death of a lab rat might lead to immediate suspension of the drug without further investigations on humans. Owing to the fact that lab rat tissues are comparable to those of our body, if a drug is harmful to the rat’s body, it might be to ours as well.
In conclusion, performing laboratory testing on animals is neither humane nor vain, but a peculiar mixture of construction and destruction. Innovation would have died out if it had not been for the death of those animals.
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- What are the factors which are related to academic success in high-school students? 67
- The graph below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 100
- Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 89
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of, with respect to, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22994652406 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02721977987 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633689839572 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9837706616 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154389434602 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474382824593 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388444386185 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887305781994 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415802908145 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.