Recently, scientists have to face an ethical dilemma over whether in vivo testing on animals is morally justified or otherwise. On the one hand, experimentation on non-human animals is oftentimes deemed ruthless, let alone inhumane. However, on the other hand, imposing a ban on animal research could carry potential adverse implications regarding human's sake.
With respect to the abolishment of animal testing, the matter in question comes down to animal welfare. Every living creature from primitive bacteria to socially complex chimpanzees is brought to this Earth with equal rights to exist. In spite of this implied contract of equity, humans throughout the course of time repeatedly rid other animals of freedoms by means of hunting or domesticating. On top of that, we now breed and keep certain classes of animals, namely rodents and primates, in laboratory settings and take their life for scientific purposes. Thus concerns are raised about such deed as dissecting live mammals due to the abusive nature of the act. As long as the academic community persists in exploiting animals, regulations are needed to standardize animal care.
Despite the evidently clear moral downsides, substantial practical applications are undeniable. Conducting trials of a newly discovered substance on other organisms instead of directly on the human body results in fewer preventable and unnecessary deaths. Based on the aftermath of the experiment, the prototype of a hypothesized drug can be either withdrawn or modified so that adverse reactions will not occur in humans. For instance, when a pharmaceutical company came up with a chemical agent that was theoretically safe on papers, the resultant death of a lab rat might lead to immediate suspension of the drug without further investigations on humans. Owing to the comparable similarity between rat tissues and those of our body, if a drug is harmful to the rat’s body, it might be to ours as well.
In conclusion, performing laboratory testing on animals is neither humane nor vain, but a peculiar mixture of construction and destruction. Innovation would have died out if it had not been for the death of those animals.
- The table shows the cost of water in 5 cities in Australia 78
- Some people think that sports play an important role in the development of society Others think they are nothing more than a leisure activity Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people prefer shopping in shopping centers while others prefer local markets What are the advantages of each Which shopping experience do you prefer 89
- There is no need to go out to see live cinema because it is better to see them on the TV or computer screen Do you agree or disagree 11
- The tradition that a family gets together is disappearing What are the reasons and what are the impacts 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of, with respect to, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32080924855 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03956254953 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656069364162 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1238646015 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0625 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146683281695 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446989456371 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416198735698 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853118109034 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421743642651 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.