Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in
formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you
think experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges?
One of the the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in people thought that experiential learning can work well in formal education, but others think its opposite that traditional form of teaching is the best. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that experiential learning is beneficial in high schools, and it cannot only contribute to colleges but also numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand in one good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attribute as responsibility, dedication, and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of experiential learning because it is good for formal education than traditional teaching.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of experiential learning are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-26 | lovepreet1124 | 85 | view |
- Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. Give the reason and relevant examples. 80
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well informal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do youthink experiential learning is beneficial in high schools or colleges? 85
- Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste. Others think that industries are the ones causing pollution. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 77
- There are more and more situations using credit cards instead of cash. It seems that cashlesssociety is becoming a reality. How realistic do you think it is ? And do you think it bringsbenefits or problems? 80
- Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education. To what extent do you agree with this opinion? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
One of the the most conspicuous trends of today's...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
One of the the most conspicuous trends of today's...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y are in favour of experiential learning because it is good for formal education ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10727969349 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96313030751 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4948249875 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.181818182 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292472311074 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983501888346 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111092068267 0.071462118173 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17238507738 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641952531157 0.0609392437508 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 77.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.