The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart presents the figures for forest distribution in various regions in the world in 1990, 2000 and 2005.
Overall, South America and Europe seemed to have the largest areas of forest land, and this pattern of almost all the regions appeared to only slightly fluctuate over time, except in Africa and South America.
In Asia, Europe, North America, and Oceania the total areas of forest tended to vary in small amplitudes, the numbers were 576, 998, 705 and 198 million ha respectively. By contrast, there was an opposite trend witnessed in the areas of two remaining regions, dropping from 749 in 1990 to 691 million ha after 15 years in Africa and from 946 to 882 million ha in 2000 in South America.
It appeared that the forest land across regions was to decline in the recorded periods, and the only exception is Europe where the total land had a positive increase in 2000, rising from 998 to 1001 million ha. North American forest land did not seem to increase but stayed unchanged in the same period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-14 | quynhhuong656 | 56 | view |
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 78
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent byBritish parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014.The second chart shows the number of children who participated inthree sports in Britain over the same time period. 78
- The line graph compares the percentage of people in three countries who used the Internet between 1999 and 2009. 61
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by threecompanies over a period of 15 years. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72471910112 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32125150717 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601123595506 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.516551666 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.166666667 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112574037829 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604580219906 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219202069015 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702894080198 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255093416686 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.