Bird decline
The author of the passage believes that the bird population is significantly going to get lower due to human intervention. However, the speaker in the lecture seems to be quite at odds with him/her. She dismisses the claim by refuting each of the points that were labelled as the reasons for the argument- rising human population, increase in agricultural expansion of lands and use of pesticides.
In the beginning, when the author tries to substantiate his/ her argument using the first reason as the encroachment of human in the habitats of birds, the orator diregards it. She mentions that in spite of development of urban housing and cities, there have been no destruction in habitats of the birds. In fact, the birds like sea gulls and pigeons were found be more in landfills and the town areas respectively.
Moving further, the speaker brings light on the loophole of the next piece of reason belonging to the author. As the writer tries to connect the increasing population with increasing destruction of forest-home of birds, for the agriculture purpose, the lecturer reveals new piece of information on development of productive crops. According to her, there are such crop varieites that have higher crop yield per unit area than before. As a result, there won't be need for more deforestation and thus no habitat will be destructed that could cause bird's decline.
Now, if these contentions were not enough to dismiss the entire argument of the essayist already, the orator pulls one final string off the last piece of the reason for bird's decline. The writer mentions that because of the rise in agriculture pesticide they pollute not only the water but also the poison the other small animals. As a result, when these noxious food and drinks are consumed by the birds, they tend to decline in number due to poisionin. However, the speaker very skillfully condemns this reason by mentioning that there has been development of less harmful pesticides as well as pest resistant crop through gene alteration. This shows that the birds won't be affected in the future anymore.
It is in this manner that the lecturer repudiates each of the reason claimed by teh author as the reason for bird's decline in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-01 | talelaldabous | 71 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | yoamdai | 80 | view |
- Bird decline 80
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias: collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 80
- Torreya taxifolia, 3
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts a 3
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... author as the reason for birds decline in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, well, in fact, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 374.0 270.72406181 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95721925134 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69476802615 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 145.348785872 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532085561497 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6995316134 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.875 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179416810986 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588230687095 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757612322821 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117371052229 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816223546628 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.