The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in UK
The graph indicates to us about how domestic access of the modern technological elements in houses changed over the year from 1996 to 2003 in UK as percentage.
It is seemed clearly that all the tends of the elements were upward during the years. CD player usage was higher than others in 1996/97 and final years among three elements. At the start of the period, home computer was more common than mobile phone untill 99s, and following that internet access, which was least common in the last year, began in 1998/99.
As regards the first, CD player was used by 60% before going up gradually to around 80% in the last year. Likewise, approximately 20% usage of the mobile phone fluctuated increase to almost 60% as home computer increased steadily from nearly 25% to almost 58%. After around the 1998/99, mobile phone access was upper than home computer. Moreover, internet access, which became in 1998/99 after the others, rose gradually from roughly 10% to around 40% in 2002/03.
- The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 49
- The graph shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services- to the UK economy in twentieth century. 61
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to write in newspapers. What factors influence these decisions? Do you think we become used to bad news? Should more good news be reported? 73
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives. What kind of problems can this cause ? What solution can you suggest ? 78
- Each year, the crime rate increases.What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, likewise, moreover, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89285714286 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33587537671 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2489513275 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141896398625 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623207113017 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911449366276 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129958889581 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114221827597 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.