The line graph compares the volume of waste of three companies between 2000 and 2015.
Overall, there was a significant increase in the proportion of waste production of company C. A reverse pattern was seen towards company A and B in the same period.
In 2000, the amounts of waste produced of A gained 12 tonnes, which was 4 tonnes higher than that of the second rank, company B. Over a course of 15 years, the former decreased significantly, ending at nearly 9 tonnes in 2015. In contrast, the latter increased slightly and reached a peak of 10 tonnes before it plunged to its rock bottom at 3 tonnes.
From 2000 to 2015, company C was seen the most dramatic changes in its waste production. Although it was the lowest number of waste output, at 4 tonnes in 2000, there was a remarkable increase to 10 tonnes and took a lead at the end of the survey.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 62
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- An increase in production of consumer goods result in damage of the natural environment . What are the reasons and possible solutions. 84
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts rock bottom at 3 tonnes. From 2000 to 2015, company C was seen the most dra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 708.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50955414013 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56663399125 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8933077177 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217682352545 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105929280335 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679791476712 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147872523427 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550645845143 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.