summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage.
In this set of materils the reading part discussed the problem of the population of frog species and probabile solution, and, the listening section cast doubt on the information presented on the and argues that they are not practical solution and don not protect frogs and do not make increase their population.
First, the passage poists that pesricides have negetive infact on the population of frogs and shoul elliminate. However the lecture makes the point that this solution not economical and fair. farmers should use pesticides because without that not only their crops decrease but also they can not comute with other farmers. never do the pesticides have severe infact on the population of the frogs. Hence, this solution dont have potatiol to solve the problem.
Second, according to the text fungues. the speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that fungus speard all around the enviroment and it is not possible omit them, not only does it is expensive but also is imposible. they produce new offsprings and diffuse again and again.
Third. the aticle claims that human acctivites and abuse in the using of watter have negetive effect. the lecture points out that although using watter source has negetive effect on the population of the frogs, global warming is more important factor than it does. frogs are vulnarable in facing of warm and this phenomena makes the population of them to oncrease and in the compration of decearising watter supply has more important effect in their population.
In conclusion, the talk bolsters, thementioned piece of information in the passage
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | salarmoheb | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | salarmoheb | 90 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- Why go to university? 73
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 88
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...pulation of frogs and shoul elliminate. However the lecture makes the point that this s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Farmers
... this solution not economical and fair. farmers should use pesticides because without t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Never
...they can not comute with other farmers. never do the pesticides have severe infact on...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tion of the frogs. Hence, this solution dont have potatiol to solve the problem. S...
^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... Second, according to the text fungues. the speaker disagrees with this point, and,...
^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...ot possible omit them, not only does it is expensive but also is imposible. they p...
^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: be
...ot possible omit them, not only does it is expensive but also is imposible. they p...
^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... it is expensive but also is imposible. they produce new offsprings and diffuse agai...
^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...s and diffuse again and again. Third. the aticle claims that human acctivites and...
^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e using of watter have negetive effect. the lecture points out that although using ...
^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Frogs
... is more important factor than it does. frogs are vulnarable in facing of warm and th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...gs are vulnarable in facing of warm and this phenomena makes the population of them ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16091954023 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57199158348 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547892720307 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5101094768 49.2860985944 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.615384615 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0857606646306 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270140534438 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327311685788 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0444500396039 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294009504483 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.