Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is no denying that cars and other vehicles cause air pollution. international car-free days may sound as an effective way to control pollution however in my opinion it wouldn’t give satisfactory results. The international car-free days wouldn’t be an effective way of reducing air pollution because the smoke from industries and other sources account for air pollution way more than the pollution caused by the cars. Another reason for this is that pulling off something like this on an international scale may not be successful.
Firstly, burning fossil fuels like coal, petrol, etc. , smoke from industries, agricultural activities etc. are the major cause of air pollution all around the world. Car-free days would have a little to no contribution in reducing air pollution. For instance, in the city Delhi of India a rule of odd-even cars was implemented. Only the odd cars were allowed on the odd dates of the month and even cars on the even days of the month to control the rising air pollution in the city. this program resulted in lesser traffic on the roads but having contributed nothing in the reduction of the air pollution in the city. Just like this car-free days would prove to be a failure. I think instead of car-free days controlling the pollution caused by the major sources would be a sound practice.
Further, initiating such a program all around the world sounds like a hassle. we are still tackling with the problem of global warming and climate change on an international scale and have gotten nowhere near the solution. Banning plastic bags, planting trees, etc. we have tried it all, still no favorable results. Who is to say that initiating the car-free days would be fruitful? it is like shooting an arrow in the dark and hoping it hit the target. this idea doesn’t sound promising.
In a nutshell, to reduce pollution the main focus should be on the major causes of the pollution instead of tackling with the minor issues like the pollution caused by the cars. it is important to focus on the big picture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | Dikshaa_007 | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-11 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-11 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your 54
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council. "An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby 16
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. 50
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 33
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: International
...and other vehicles cause air pollution. international car-free days may sound as an effective...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing fossil fuels like coal, petrol, etc. , smoke from industries, agricultural act...
^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...l the rising air pollution in the city. this program resulted in lesser traffic on t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... around the world sounds like a hassle. we are still tackling with the problem of ...
^^
Line 9, column 384, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ng the car-free days would be fruitful? it is like shooting an arrow in the dark a...
^^
Line 9, column 455, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... the dark and hoping it hit the target. this idea doesn't sound promising. ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 40, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
... In a nutshell, to reduce pollution the main focus should be on the major causes of the po...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...like the pollution caused by the cars. it is important to focus on the big pictur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, may, so, still, for instance, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93123209169 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76130847422 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47564469914 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4630940779 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.2272727273 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8636363636 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23563073224 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689456258324 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794112240637 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135470219576 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108635305529 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.