The line graph depicts different quantities of products transported from one place to another in UK from 1994 to 2002 by using various methods of transportation.
Overall, the quantity of goods transported by majority mode of transports (road, water and pipeline) increased over the years except by rail which showed opposite pattern. The most famous mode of transportation, however, was road.
In 1974, 70 millions tons of goods were delivered by road transportations, which was around seven times the quantity conveyed by pipeline. The quantity increased gradually for both of these reaching up to 20 million and 100 million tons by pipeline and road respectively in 2002.
In contrast, both water and rail transport facilities carried 40 million goods in 1974. In case of former, this number ascended gradually in following years, and ended up at slightly above 60 million tons being transported by water in 2002. Contrarily, number of goods carried by rail dropped significantly after 1974, fluctuated over the following years but became 40 million tons again in end of timeline.
- With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources.To what extent do you agree? 89
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works. 56
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the number of trips made by children in one country to travel to school in 1990 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 67
- technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this statement ? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f former, this number ascended gradually in following years, and ended up at slig...
^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y rail dropped significantly after 1974, fluctuated over the following years but ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27167630058 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95953757225 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8167869471 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219261592881 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101052884835 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613641883734 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139941349432 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456975127724 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.