Some people think that school should educate pupils according to their academic abilities, others believe that pupils with different abilities should educate together. Discuss the both views and give your opinion.
It is incontrovertible fact hat the education is prominent source of everyone and it makes the children successful person. Few masses accord that student in schools should be taught according to their academic ability. However, others thinking is opposite with this argument. This essay examines the both view points and rendered my opinion in the upcoming paragraphs.
To embark with, there are plethora of reasons why studying the student according to their learning ability are beneficial. The first and foremost is that they can learn for better in separate classes than in mixed classes. Because, the teacher can taught some complex concept which make them more capable and intellectual sharper which they cannot taught in mixed classes. In addition to this, some time with brilliant student are spoiling their life with influence of the weakest student. For example, a survey conduct that in many schools student do not concentrate in their study because of spoilt children pressure and they ruin their academic prospect.
On the other hand, group of masses says study together is an accurate method. The system of filtering the student gives a sense of inferiority to those who are not selected in brighter student groups. And, it can affected on their student level ability. As well as, if the student are doing study with intelligent pupils they may get inspired by them and may learn to do well in the studies. To example, those students who gets only 40% to 50% marks, if they would do education with them they can increase their interest in education and can achieve 70% to 80% in their studies.
In conculsion, both methods are right in their own place. However, the separate classes can harmful effect on weak students mind. Also, in this way their self-esteem can hurt. So, the school should talk the students equally either they are smarter or weaker students.
- As technological innovation brings about rapid change retraining becomes a lifelong necessity Therefore industry should be take responsibility for the education training of their workers To what extent do you agree to this idea 38
- The tables beliw shows the distribution of students at UK university by mode of study and gender 88
- The graph show that the pollution level in london during 1550 to 2000. 78
- Many children these days have their own mobile phones what are the advantages and disadvantages of it. 67
- People nowadays work hard to buy more things. This have made our life generally more comfortable but it is a pity many traditional values have been lost on the way to such materialism what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 534, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
... example, a survey conduct that in many schools student do not concentrate in their stu...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 214, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...in brighter student groups. And, it can affected on their student level ability. As well...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07371794872 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49614265205 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560897435897 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3303514249 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9444444444 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220817190204 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694345613524 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512350075154 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144695042388 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657777341061 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.