Percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university
The table compares the proportion of students voting good ratings for various aspects of a university over the decade.
It is evident that the percentage of students who gave sufficient ratings on all aspects was relatively higher in 2010 than 2000 with the two exceptions of range of modules offered and teaching facilities which went down and stayed stable accordingly.
Looking at the table in more detail, the ratio for teaching quality and printing resources experienced minuscule fluctuation ranging from 65 to 69 and 87 to 88 respectively although generally increased steadily between 2000 and 2010. By contrast, it is interesting to note that the level of range of modules offered by university decreased moderately changing from 32 to 27 whereas electronic resources almost doubled and reached the same percentage with printing resources over the same period shown. However only building or teaching facilities remained firm by 77 % over the same decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
- Many small local shops are closing as they are unable to compete with large supermarkets in the area How does this affect local communities How could this situation be improved 86
- number of arrests per year using illegal drugs 55
- Some businesses face problems with new employees who just finished their education and lack some interpersonal skills such as the ability to work in a team What do you think is the main cause of the problem How can it be resolved 87
- An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries What problems does this cause What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation 84
- The international community should take action to ensure that all countries reduce the consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38157894737 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85527422218 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651315789474 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.5896731886 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.6 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221212820559 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126693250362 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140484940381 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198673685753 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140114189216 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.