The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph compares how many visitors were visited in three different museums Met, Edo, and National from 2000 to 2005.

Overall, the increasing number of visitors were noticed in National, China, while the declining number in Edo-Tokyo. Moreover, the highest viewers deserves National, China and the lowest viewers seen in Edo-Tokyo.

In 2000, the most significant visitors (13 million) were reported in Edo-Tokyo, and this rate was highest in 2000. The figures for National stood half than that of MET. In the following year, there was a remarkable difference between the visitors of Edo-Tokyo and MET, New York, with the former stood first with 13 million and latter 6 million.

The visitors of MET and Edo in the year of 2003 were minor difference (7 and 6 million, respectively). However, while the former experienced a rapid increase about 5 million in the following year, latter just 1.8 million. The disparity between MET and Edo museum have 2 million in both years 2004 and 2005. National museum ranked first in last year and stood at 15.8 million.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03409090909 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5604015294 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556818181818 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6512243049 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138737954412 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663919820487 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640364918868 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105510411365 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578731660965 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.