Given the fact that there are a lot of people who think that, in our time, we have a wide range of choices, which is slightly correct, however, like any other thing, having a lot of choices to pick from, can have both, a negative and positive impact. Hence, through this essay, I would to come across these two areas in details.
First, talking about the positive impact of having many options to choose from, the primary example that crosses my mind is education. As education came a long way, having many majors to choose to study from at the university, and also getting the option to pursue higher studies and select from a long list, the most appropriate program, made people more invested and interested in educational development. Whereas in older times, not too many options to study from were available. Therefore, people rather favoured to stick to workman-ships, instead of being motivated to seek academic growth. In addition, having the ability to choose from the wide food range available nowadays, makes it easier on mothers who cook. Precisely, if a family member did not like the cooked food, he can easily order his choice of food, solving a problem.
On the contrary, the plenty TV shows you can pick from, I believe, made people lazier. Wanting to binge watch all episodes of a TV show rather than going outdoor and exercise. Furthermore, mobile applications’ choices specifically games, have the equivalent negative impact as TV shows. In addition to distracting employees during their working hours resulting in lag of task delivery.
In conclusion, I emphasise that in our time, we do have many choices, but we should be fully aware of the pros and cons of having that variety of them.
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, talking about, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90753424658 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65172672529 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626712328767 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7604686182 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.230769231 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184162879604 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584210703718 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572499359328 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122462142679 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606453339779 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.