The presented bar chart demonstrates the percentage of Australian boys and girls in various age categories, who did basic physical activity in the year 2010. From an overall perspective, women from different age groups showed slightly higher engagement in physical activity rather than men. However, it can be noted that in late life stages, the percentage of both studied populations became nearly equivalent.
In more details, you can tell that males tend to be more active at younger ages. Whereas, from 15 to 24-year-old, 52.8% showed involvement in physical activities regularly. Moreover, this percentage rate descends through the course of years to reach 39.5% between ages 35 and 44. Only to escalate again and reach 46.7%, in a span of 30 years (65 and over) precisely.
On the other hand, women have the trend of percentages varying between almost 47% and 53%, achieving nearly a 6% divergence through the years. Hence, starting from 47.7% between 15 and 24, to reaching the peak of 53.3% in the range 45 to 54 years of age and then dropping back to exactly 47.1% at 65 and above, similar to the percentage of men categorised in the senior age group.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 50
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95408163265 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70596295741 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647959183673 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0750863292 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342192274981 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124692792761 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124954780121 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228335295695 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160213492792 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.