Having friends is the one of the most important parts of our life. I disagree that it is more important to keep our old friends than to make new friends. I have two reasons about this which I will explore in this essay.
First of all, keeping a communication is hard if you leave your old friends. I believe, we have to age or graduate school. We leave our classmates. Hence, we make new friends in new school. An old friend will be in touch later on or meet only a few times a year. For example, before I moved in Gangnam, I lived in Gangbuk. There, I really had a kind friend for 13 years. After moving to another city, we only converse sometimes.
Secondly, old friends often have quarrel. Actually new friends also have fights but not often. There are times when we have each other when we fight like that. Therefore, we don’t meet for long times. Then your relationship with your friend will drift apart by itself. For instance, my new friend experience this. He also had an old friend. He always hangout with me now, so he doesn’t hangout with his old friend anymore.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that having new friend is important and then keeping your old.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Some people think that family is the most important influence on young adults Other people think that friends are the most important influence in young adults Which view do you agree with Use examples to support your position 73
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child(5-10 years old)? 1.being helpful2.Being honest3.Being well organized 60
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching films as they learn by reading books 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'have' and 'quarrel'.
Suggestion: have often quarrel
...rse sometimes. Secondly, old friends often have quarrel. Actually new friends also have fights ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'quarreled', 'quarrelled'.
Suggestion: quarreled; quarrelled
...es. Secondly, old friends often have quarrel. Actually new friends also have fights ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...nce this. He also had an old friend. He always hangout with me now, so he doesn't hangou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d friend. He always hangout with me now, so he doesn't hangout with his old ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 1977.66487455 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 217.0 407.700716846 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50230414747 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43761814153 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 212.727598566 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589861751152 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 618.680645161 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 20.1344086022 50% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.1663115909 48.9658058833 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 48.85 100.406767564 49% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.85 20.6045352989 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300143368178 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986586405139 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113278425902 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217255262075 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490394846247 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.2 11.7677419355 44% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.71 58.1214874552 149% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.7 10.1575268817 36% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.64 10.9000537634 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 86.8835125448 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.0537634409 60% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 10.247311828 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.